Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36622410›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Clinical value of artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: a prospective study from the real world.

Yingying Li, Yihao Liu, Jing Xiao, Lin Yan, Zhen Yang, Xinyang Li, Mingbo Zhang, Yukun Luo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Human-AI collaboration for ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules: a clinical trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yingying LiMedical School of Chinese PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Yihao LiuMedical School of Chinese PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jing XiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Lin YanDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Zhen YangMedical School of Chinese PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xinyang LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Mingbo ZhangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. owsifanduizhe@126.com.
Yukun LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China. lyk301@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of a commercial artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted ultrasonography (US) for thyroid nodules and to validate its value in real-world medical practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom March 2021 to July 2021, 236 consecutive patients with 312 suspicious thyroid nodules were prospectively enrolled in this study. One experienced radiologist performed US examinations with a real-time AI system (S-Detect). US images and AI reports of the nodules were recorded. Nine residents and three senior radiologists were invited to make a "benign" or "malignant" diagnosis based on recorded US images without knowing the AI reports. After referring to AI reports, the diagnosis was made again. The diagnostic performance of AI, residents, and senior radiologists with and without AI reports were analyzed.

resultsThe sensitivity, accuracy, and AUC of the AI system were 0.95, 0.84, and 0.753, respectively, and were not statistically different from those of the experienced radiologists, but were superior to those of the residents (all p < 0.01). The AI-assisted resident strategy significantly improved the accuracy and sensitivity for nodules ≤ 1.5 cm (all p < 0.01), while reducing the unnecessary biopsy rate by up to 27.7% for nodules > 1.5 cm (p = 0.034).

conclusionsThe AI system achieved performance, for cancer diagnosis, comparable to that of an average senior thyroid radiologist. The AI-assisted strategy can significantly improve the overall diagnostic performance for less-experienced radiologists, while increasing the discovery of thyroid cancer ≤ 1.5 cm and reducing unnecessary biopsies for nodules > 1.5 cm in real-world medical practice. KEY POINTS: • The AI system reached a senior radiologist-like level in the evaluation of thyroid cancer and could significantly improve the overall diagnostic performance of residents. • The AI-assisted strategy significantly improved ≤ 1.5 cm thyroid cancer screening AUC, accuracy, and sensitivity of the residents, leading to an increased detection of thyroid cancer while maintaining a comparable specificity to that of radiologists alone. • The AI-assisted strategy significantly reduced the unnecessary biopsy rate for thyroid nodules > 1.5 cm by the residents, while maintaining a comparable sensitivity to that of radiologists alone.

Indexed as

Thyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleArtificial IntelligenceHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceBiopsyRadiologistThyroid nodulesUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.