ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023
Genomic Analysis of the Suspicious SARS-CoV-2 Sequences in the Public Sequencing Database.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined NGS and proteomics improves viral diagnostics in wildlife: coronaviruses confirmed in hedgehogs.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Indexing and searching petabase-scale nucleotide resources.Nature methods · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 has infected more than 600 million people. However, the origin of the virus is still unclear; knowing where the virus came from could help us prevent future zoonotic epidemics. Sequencing data, particularly metagenomic data, can profile the genomes of all species in the sample, including those not recognized at the time, thus allowing for the identification of the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 in samples collected before the pandemic. We analyzed the data from 5,196 SARS-CoV-2-positive sequencing runs in the NCBI's SRA database with collection dates prior to 2020 or unknown. We found that the mutation patterns obtained from these suspicious SARS-CoV-2 reads did not match the genome characteristics of an unknown progenitor of the virus, suggesting that they may derive from circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants or other coronaviruses. Despite a negative result for tracking the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2, the methods developed in the study could assist in pinpointing the origin of various pathogens in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.