Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36621907›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2022

Discriminating goal-directed and habitual cocaine seeking in rats using a novel outcome devaluation procedure.

Bradley O Jones, Adelis M Cruz, Tabitha H Kim, Haley F Spencer, Rachel J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Goal-directed actions and habits in head-fixed mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley O JonesInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5213-3759
Adelis M CruzDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-6684
Tabitha H KimDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9585-660X
Haley F SpencerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8838-1909
Rachel J SmithInstitute for Neuroscience, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5212-561X

Funding

Establishing a link between habits and punishment resistanceR01DA046457 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, RACHEL J · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Opposing Roles of Distinct Output Projections From Prefrontal CortexR21DA037744 · NIDA · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, RACHEL J · 2014 to 2015
$368k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA046457NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA037744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Habits are theorized to play a key role in compulsive cocaine seeking, yet there is limited methodology for assessing habitual responding for intravenous (IV) cocaine. We developed a novel outcome devaluation procedure to discriminate goal-directed from habitual responding in cocaine-seeking rats. This procedure elicits devaluation temporarily and requires no additional training, allowing repeated testing at different time points. After training male rats to self-administer IV cocaine, we devalued the drug outcome via experimenter-administered IV cocaine (a "satiety" procedure) prior to a 10-min extinction test. Many rats were sensitive to outcome devaluation, a hallmark of goal-directed responding. These animals reduced responding when given a dose of experimenter-administered cocaine that matched or exceeded satiety levels during self-administration. However, other rats were insensitive to experimenter-administered cocaine, suggesting their responding was habitual. Importantly, reinforcement schedules and neural manipulations that produce goal-directed responding (i.e., ratio schedules or dorsolateral striatum lesions) caused sensitivity to outcome devaluation, whereas reinforcement schedules and neural manipulations that produce habitual responding (i.e., interval schedules or dorsomedial striatum lesions) caused insensitivity. Satiety-based outcome devaluation is an innovative new tool to dissect the neural and behavioral mechanisms underlying IV cocaine-seeking behavior.

Indexed as

CocaineAnimalsConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalGoalsMaleMotivationRatsCocaine

Identifiers

PMID36621907
PMCPMC9749853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.