Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36621750›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023

Mining for equitable health: Assessing the impact of missing data in electronic health records.

Emily Getzen, Lyle Ungar, Danielle Mowery, Xiaoqian Jiang, Qi Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily GetzenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: getzene@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Lyle UngarDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Danielle MoweryDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Xiaoqian JiangUTHealth School of Biomedical Informatics, Houston, TX, United States.
Qi LongDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States. Electronic address: qlong@upenn.edu.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Advancing Analysis of Multi-omics Data in Alzheimer's Disease ResearchRF1AG063481 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2019 to 2020
$3.8M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01LM013712 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Privacy-preserving methods and tools for handling missing data in distributed health data networksR01GM124111 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LONG, QI · 2017 to 2020
$2.3M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066749NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG063481NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHR) are collected as a routine part of healthcare delivery, and have great potential to be utilized to improve patient health outcomes. They contain multiple years of health information to be leveraged for risk prediction, disease detection, and treatment evaluation. However, they do not have a consistent, standardized format across institutions, particularly in the United States, and can present significant analytical challenges- they contain multi-scale data from heterogeneous domains and include both structured and unstructured data. Data for individual patients are collected at irregular time intervals and with varying frequencies. In addition to the analytical challenges, EHR can reflect inequity- patients belonging to different groups will have differing amounts of data in their health records. Many of these issues can contribute to biased data collection. The consequence is that the data for under-served groups may be less informative partly due to more fragmented care, which can be viewed as a type of missing data problem. For EHR data in this complex form, there is currently no framework for introducing realistic missing values. There has also been little to no work in assessing the impact of missing data in EHR. In this work, we first introduce a terminology to define three levels of EHR data and then propose a novel framework for simulating realistic missing data scenarios in EHR to adequately assess their impact on predictive modeling. We incorporate the use of a medical knowledge graph to capture dependencies between medical events to create a more realistic missing data framework. In an intensive care unit setting, we found that missing data have greater negative impact on the performance of disease prediction models in groups that tend to have less access to healthcare, or seek less healthcare. We also found that the impact of missing data on disease prediction models is stronger when using the knowledge graph framework to introduce realistic missing values as opposed to random event removal.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsHumansIntensive Care UnitsUnited StatesElectronic health recordsFairnessHealth disparitiesKnowledge graphMissing data

Identifiers

PMID36621750
PMCPMC10391553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.