Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36621591›Full record

SynthesisOsteoarthritis and cartilage2023

Uncovering the "riddle of femininity" in osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of menopausal animal models and mathematical modeling of estrogen treatment.

G Gilmer, A C Bean, H Iijima, N Jackson, R C Thurston, F Ambrosio

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Osteoarthritis as a systemic disease.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G GilmerMedical Scientist Training Program, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Cellular and Molecular Pathology Graduate Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Discovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding, Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: gabbygilmer@pitt.edu.
A C BeanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: beanac2@upmc.edu.
H IijimaInstitute for Advanced Research, Nagoya University, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. Electronic address: iijima@met.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
N JacksonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: ncj8@pitt.edu.
R C ThurstonDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: thurstonrc@upmc.edu.
F AmbrosioDiscovery Center for Musculoskeletal Recovery, Schoen Adams Research Institute at Spaulding, Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: fambrosio@mgh.harvard.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USHarvard University · USNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MD/PHD STUDENTST32GM008208 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINMAN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2021
$15.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001856 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, KRISTIN N, RUBIO, DORIS M · 2016 to 2025
$13.8M
Pitt Integrated Clinical and Geroscience Research Training ProgramT32AG021885 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aditi U Gurkar · 2003 to 2026
$6.7M
Interdisciplinary Mentoring and Research in Womens Cardiovascular HealthK24HL123565 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI THURSTON, REBECCA C · 2014 to 2023
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001856NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL123565NIA NIH HHS T32 AG021885NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePost-menopausal women are disproportionately affected by osteoarthritis (OA). As such, the purpose of this study was to (1) summarize the state-of-the-science aimed at understanding the effects of menopause on OA in animal models and (2) investigate how dosage and timing of initiation of estrogen treatment affect cartilage degeneration.

designA systematic review identified articles studying menopausal effects on cartilage in preclinical models. A meta-analysis was performed using overlapping cartilage outcomes in conjunction with a rigor and reproducibility analysis. Ordinary differential equation models were used to determine if a relationship exists between cartilage degeneration and the timing of initiation or dosage of estrogen treatment.

resultsThirty-eight manuscripts were eligible for inclusion. The most common menopause model used was ovariectomy (92%), and most animals were young at the time of menopause induction (86%). Most studies did not report inclusion criteria, animal monitoring, protocol registration, or data accessibility. Cartilage outcomes were worse in post-menopausal animals compared to age-matched, non-menopausal animals, as evidenced by cartilage histological scoring [0.75, 1.72], cartilage thickness [-4.96, -0.96], type II collagen [-4.87, -0.56], and c-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type II collagen (CTX-II) [2.43, 5.79] (95% CI of Effect Size (+greater in menopause, -greater in non-menopause)). Moreover, modeling suggests that cartilage health may be improved with early initiation and higher doses of estrogen treatment.

conclusionsTo improve translatability, animal models that consider aging and natural menopause should be utilized, and more attention to rigor and reproducibility is needed. Timing of initiation and dosage may be important factors modulating therapeutic effects of estrogen on cartilage.

Indexed as

Cartilage DiseasesOsteoarthritisAnimalsCollagen Type IIDisease Models, AnimalEstrogensFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsCollagen Type IIEstrogensEstrogenMenopauseMeta-analysisOsteoarthritisOvariectomyTiming hypothesis

Identifiers

PMID36621591
PMCPMC10033429
OpenAlexW4313641533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.