Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36621153›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2023

AlphaFold2 protein structure prediction: Implications for drug discovery.

Neera Borkakoti, Janet M Thornton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peptide Aptamers: Innovative Design and Applications in Pathogen Detection.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Functional Characterization of a Novel OTU-like Deubiquitinase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Neera BorkakotiEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.
Janet M ThorntonEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK. Electronic address: thornton@ebi.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drug discovery process involves designing compounds to selectively interact with their targets. The majority of therapeutic targets for low molecular weight (small molecule) drugs are proteins. The outstanding accuracy with which recent artificial intelligence methods compile the three-dimensional structure of proteins has made protein targets more accessible to the drug design process. Here, we present our perspective of the significance of accurate protein structure prediction on various stages of the small molecule drug discovery life cycle focusing on current capabilities and assessing how further evolution of such predictive procedures can have a more decisive impact in the discovery of new medicines.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DiscoveryDrug DesignProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID36621153
PMCPMC7614146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.