Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36621078›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2023

A deep learning method to detect opioid prescription and opioid use disorder from electronic health records.

Aditya Kashyap, Chris Callison-Burch, Mary Regina Boland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Detecting Opioid Use Disorder in Health Claims Data With Positive Unlabeled Learning.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Clinical risk prediction using language models: benefits and considerations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aditya KashyapDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Chris Callison-BurchDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mary Regina BolandDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America; Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America; Center for Excellence in Environmental Toxicology, University of Pennsylvania, United States of America; Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States of America. Electronic address: bolandm@upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAs the opioid epidemic continues across the United States, methods are needed to accurately and quickly identify patients at risk for opioid use disorder (OUD). The purpose of this study is to develop two predictive algorithms: one to predict opioid prescription and one to predict OUD. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed an informatics algorithm that trains two deep learning models over patient Electronic Health Records (EHRs) using the MIMIC-III database. We utilize both the structured and unstructured parts of the EHR and show that it is possible to predict both challenging outcomes.

resultsOur deep learning models incorporate elements from EHRs to predict opioid prescription with an F1-score of 0.88 ± 0.003 and an AUC-ROC of 0.93 ± 0.002. We also constructed a model to predict OUD diagnosis achieving an F1-score of 0.82 ± 0.05 and AUC-ROC of 0.94 ± 0.008. DISCUSSION: Our model for OUD prediction outperformed prior algorithms for specificity, F1 score and AUC-ROC while achieving equivalent sensitivity. This demonstrates the importance of a) deep learning approaches in predicting OUD and b) incorporating both structured and unstructured data for this prediction task. No prediction models for opioid prescription as an outcome were found in the literature and therefore our model is the first to predict opioid prescribing behavior.

conclusionAlgorithms such as those described in this paper will become increasingly important to understand the drivers underlying this national epidemic.

Indexed as

Deep LearningOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidElectronic Health RecordsHumansMachine LearningPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrescriptionsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidData miningElectronic health recordsMachine learningNatural language processingOpioid

Identifiers

PMID36621078
PMCPMC9898169
OpenAlexW4313398963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.