Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620994›Full record

Observational studyEuropean psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists2023

Assessment of beliefs and attitudes about electroconvulsive therapy posted on Twitter: An observational study.

L de Anta, M A Alvarez-Mon, C Donat-Vargas, F J Lara-Abelanda, V Pereira-Sanchez, C Gonzalez Rodriguez, F Mora, M A Ortega, J Quintero, M Alvarez-Mon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

L de AntaDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6127-2788
M A Alvarez-MonDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-0394
C Donat-VargasISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-4148
F J Lara-AbelandaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5565-8203
V Pereira-SanchezDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2576-1549
C Gonzalez RodriguezCentro de Salud Mental Infanto Juvenil Cornellá, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-0299
F MoraDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4698-1679
M A OrtegaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.
J QuinteroDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2491-8647
M Alvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective and safe medical procedure that mainly indicated for depression, but is also indicated for patients with other conditions. However, ECT is among the most stigmatized and controversial treatments in medicine. Our objective was to examine social media contents on Twitter related to ECT to identify and evaluate public views on the matter.

methodsWe collected Twitter posts in English and Spanish mentioning ECT between January 1, 2019 and October 31, 2020. Identified tweets were subject to a mixed method quantitative-qualitative content and sentiment analysis combining manual and semi-supervised natural language processing machine-learning analyses. Such analyses identified the distribution of tweets, their public interest (retweets and likes per tweet), and sentiment for the observed different categories of Twitter users and contents.

results"Healthcare providers" users produced more tweets (25%) than "people with lived experience" and their "relatives" (including family members and close friends or acquaintances) (10% combined), and were the main publishers of "medical" content (mostly related to ECT's main indications). However, more than half of the total tweets had "joke or trivializing" contents, and such had a higher like and retweet ratio. Among those tweets manifesting personal opinions on ECT, around 75% of them had a negative sentiment.

conclusionsMixed method analysis of social media contents on Twitter offers a novel perspective to examine public opinion on ECT, and our results show attitudes more negative than those reflected in studies using surveys and other traditional methods.

Indexed as

Electroconvulsive TherapySocial MediaAttitudeEmotionsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesECTelectroconvulsive therapypublic opinionsocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID36620994
PMCPMC9970148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.