Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620744›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2023

Acute physiological outcomes of high-intensity functional training: a scoping review.

Jacob M McDougle, Gerald T Mangine, Jeremy R Townsend, Adam R Jajtner, Yuri Feito

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Effects of CrossFitInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jacob M McDougle *Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.
Gerald T Mangine *Exercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2718-2564
Jeremy R TownsendExercise and Nutrition Science, Lipscomb University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Adam R JajtnerExercise Physiology, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Yuri FeitoExercise Science and Sport Management, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses related to high-intensity functional training (HIFT) have been conducted. However, due to a restricted pool of available research, these investigations are often limited in scope. As such, a scoping review investigating the present literature surrounding the acute physiological response to HIFT-based exercise was chosen as a more appropriate structured review. Methodology: A scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. Three large scale databases were searched to reveal any article pertaining to HIFT and related exercise terminology. Results: A total of 2,241 articles were found during the initial search. Following this, titles, then abstracts, and full-texts were reviewed to determine inclusion eligibility. A total of 60 articles which investigated a combined total of 35 unique HIFT workouts were included within this review. Conclusions: A variety of physiological parameters and HIFT workouts have been examined. Markers of intensity (

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingExerciseHumansInflammationCrossFitExercise intensityHIITMethodologyResistance exercise

Identifiers

PMID36620744
PMCPMC9817969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.