Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620629›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Interpretable cardiac anatomy modeling using variational mesh autoencoders.

Marcel Beetz, Jorge Corral Acero, Abhirup Banerjee, Ingo Eitel, Ernesto Zacur, Torben Lange, Thomas Stiermaier, Ruben Evertz, Sören J Backhaus, Holger Thiele and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 3D cardiac shape analysis with variational point cloud autoencoders for myocardial infarction prediction and virtual heart synthesis.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marcel BeetzInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jorge Corral AceroInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abhirup BanerjeeInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ingo EitelUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Lübeck, Germany.
Ernesto ZacurInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Torben LangeDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas StiermaierUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Medical Clinic II, Cardiology, Angiology, and Intensive Care Medicine, Lübeck, Germany.
Ruben EvertzDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Sören J BackhausDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Holger ThieleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Alfonso Bueno-OrovioDepartment of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Pablo LamataDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andreas SchusterDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany.
Vicente GrauInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/17/22/32644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac anatomy and function vary considerably across the human population with important implications for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning. Consequently, many computer-based approaches have been developed to capture this variability for a wide range of applications, including explainable cardiac disease detection and prediction, dimensionality reduction, cardiac shape analysis, and the generation of virtual heart populations. In this work, we propose a variational mesh autoencoder (mesh VAE) as a novel geometric deep learning approach to model such population-wide variations in cardiac shapes. It embeds multi-scale graph convolutions and mesh pooling layers in a hierarchical VAE framework to enable direct processing of surface mesh representations of the cardiac anatomy in an efficient manner. The proposed mesh VAE achieves low reconstruction errors on a dataset of 3D cardiac meshes from over 1,000 patients with acute myocardial infarction, with mean surface distances between input and reconstructed meshes below the underlying image resolution. We also find that it outperforms a voxelgrid-based deep learning benchmark in terms of both mean surface distance and Hausdorff distance while requiring considerably less memory. Furthermore, we explore the quality and interpretability of the mesh VAE's latent space and showcase its ability to improve the prediction of major adverse cardiac events over a clinical benchmark. Finally, we investigate the method's ability to generate realistic virtual populations of cardiac anatomies and find good alignment between the synthesized and gold standard mesh populations in terms of multiple clinical metrics.

Indexed as

3D ventricular shape analysisacute myocardial infarctionclinical outcome predictiongeometric deep learninggraph neural networksmajor adverse cardiac eventsmesh VAEvirtual anatomy generation

Identifiers

PMID36620629
PMCPMC9813669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.