ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Radiomic analysis of enhanced CMR cine images predicts left ventricular remodeling after TAVR in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop enhanced cine image-based radiomic models for non-invasive prediction of left ventricular adverse remodeling following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Methods: A total of 69 patients (male:female = 37:32, median age: 66 years, range: 47-83 years) were retrospectively recruited, and severe aortic stenosis was confirmed Results: Five basal levels, seven middle levels, eight apical level radiomic features, and three clinical factors were finally selected for model development. The radiomic models using features from basal level (Rad I), middle level (Rad II), and apical level (Rad III) had achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.761, 0.909, and 0.913 in the training dataset and 0.718, 0.836, and 0.845 in the validation dataset, respectively. The performance of these radiomic models was improved after integrating clinical factors, with AUCs of the Combined I, Combined II, and Combined III models increasing to 0.906, 0.956, and 0.959 in the training dataset and 0.784, 0.873, and 0.891 in the validation dataset, respectively. All models showed good calibration, and the decision curve analysis indicated that the Combined III model had a higher net benefit than other models across the majority of threshold probabilities. Conclusion: Radiomic models and combined models at the mid and apical slices showed outstanding and comparable predictive effectiveness of adverse remodeling for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis after TAVR, and both models were significantly better than the models of basal slice. The cardiac magnetic resonance radiomic analysis might serve as an effective tool for accurately predicting left ventricular adverse remodeling following TAVR in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.