Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

A tomographic microscopy-compatible Langendorff system for the dynamic structural characterization of the cardiac cycle.

Hector Dejea, Christian M Schlepütz, Natalia Méndez-Carmona, Maria Arnold, Patricia Garcia-Canadilla, Sarah L Longnus, Marco Stampanoni, Bart Bijnens, Anne Bonnin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Addressing Current Challenges in OSL Dosimetry Using MgBMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hector DejeaPaul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Christian M SchlepützPaul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Natalia Méndez-CarmonaDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Maria ArnoldDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Patricia Garcia-CanadillaBCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sarah L LongnusDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco StampanoniPaul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Bart BijnensInstitut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Anne BonninPaul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiac architecture has been extensively investigated Methods: This work presents the customization of an isolated, perfused heart system compatible with synchrotron-based X-ray phase contrast imaging (X-PCI). Results: Thanks to the capabilities of the developed setup, it was possible to visualize a beating isolated, perfused rat heart for the very first time in 4D at an unprecedented 2.75 μm pixel size (10.6 μm spatial resolution), and 1 ms temporal resolution. Discussion: The customized setup allows high-spatial resolution studies of heart architecture along the cardiac cycle and has thus the potential to serve as a tool for the characterization of the structural dynamics of the heart, including the effects of drugs and other substances able to modify the cardiac cycle.

Indexed as

4D imagingcardiac cycleLangendorffsynchrotrontomographic microscopy

Identifiers

PMID36620622
PMCPMC9815149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.