Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620554›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

What is the future of treatment de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer? A review of ongoing clinical trials.

Emma A Mensour, Shintha Alam, Seliya Mawani, Houda Bahig, Pencilla Lang, Anthony Nichols, David A Palma, Katie Jasper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emma A MensourSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Shintha AlamSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Seliya MawaniSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Houda BahigDepartment of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Pencilla LangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Anthony NicholsDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
David A PalmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Katie JasperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased in incidence in recent decades. With higher cure rates in younger populations, long-term survivors may live with acute- and long-term toxicity, leading to increased interest in de-escalation treatment strategies for HPV-related OPSCC. Herein, we have examined the current landscape of clinical trials in this context. Methods: A review of active clinical trials related to de-escalation of HPV-associated OPSCC treatment was performed using the clinicaltrials.gov database from inception to January 2022. A search using the key words "oropharyngeal cancer" and "HPV" was completed. Three investigators independently reviewed each trial, with any discrepancies settled by a fourth. Data collected from each study included study phase, study design, primary, and secondary endpoints, and de-escalation treatment strategies. A final 24 articles were selected for full text review. Results: Many trials (n=19, 79%) were non-randomized, and most studies employed a phase II design (n=14, 58%). Only 13% (n=3) were randomized trials, and 8% (n=2) included a phase III component. The most frequent primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) (n=9, 37.5%). With regards to the identified de-escalation strategies, all the studies (n=24) had at least one component assessing changes in RT dose/fractionation and/or a reduction in RT volumes. A smaller percentage of trials assessed surgical interventions (n=9, 37.5%) and/or changes in systemic therapy (n=8, 33.3%). Conclusion: A small number of randomized trials are underway, and a transition to more randomized phase III trials in the future will be important to change clinical practice.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyhuman papillomavirusoropharyngeal cancerradiotherapytreatment de-escalation

Identifiers

PMID36620554
PMCPMC9816564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.