Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620480›Full record

ArticleSocio-economic planning sciences2023

Scientific planning of urban cordon sanitaire for desired queuing time.

Hong-Zhi Lin, Yongping Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Socio-economic planning sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong-Zhi LinSchool of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China.
Yongping ZhangCivil Engineering Department, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, 91768, USA.
California State Polytechnic University · USSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted ofur normal life. Many cities enforced a cordon sanitaire as a countermeasure to protect densely inhabited areas. Travelers can only cross the cordon after being checked. To minimize the waiting time in the queue, this paper proposes a method to determine the scientific planning of urban cordon sanitaire for desired queuing time, which is a significant problem that has not been explored. A novel two-stage optimization model is proposed where the first stage is the transportation system equilibrium problem to predict traffic inflow, and the second stage is the queuing network design problem to determine the allocation of test stations. This method aims to minimize the total health infrastructure investment for the desired maximum queuing time. Note that queuing theory is used to represent the queuing phenomenon at each urban entrance. A heuristic algorithm is designed to solve the proposed model where the Method of Successive Averages (MSA) is adopted for the first stage, and the Genetic Algorithm (GA) with elite strategy is adopted for the second stage. An experimental study with sensitivity analysis is conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods. The results show that the methods can find a good heuristic optimal solution. This research is helpful for policymakers to determine the optimal investment and planning of cordon sanitaire for disease prevention and control, as well as other criminal activities such as drunk driving, terrorists, and smuggling.

Indexed as

Cordon sanitaireHeuristic algorithmInfrastructure investmentNetwork equilibriumQueuing theory

Identifiers

PMID36620480
PMCPMC9806930
OpenAlexW4313478208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.