Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620304›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in public health2022

Establishment and evaluation of an

Chunjie Ding, Shan Hong, Miao Zhang, Yunzhe Sun, Ning Li, Jing Zhang, Lan Ma, Linqiang Tian, Wenjie Ren, Lin Zhang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chunjie DingSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Shan HongSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Miao ZhangSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Yunzhe SunSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Ning LiSchool of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Jing ZhangSchool of Public Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, China.
Lan MaSchool of Public Health, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China.
Linqiang TianInstitute of Trauma and Orthopedics, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Wenjie RenInstitute of Trauma and Orthopedics, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Lin ZhangClinical Medical Research Center for Women and Children Diseases, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Shandong Province Affiliated to Qingdao University, Jinan, China.
Sanqiao YaoSchool of Public Health, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China.
Xinxiang Medical University · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNQingdao University · CNWeifang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gas explosion is a fatal disaster commonly occurred in coal mining and often causes systematic physical injuries, of which blast lung injury is the primary one and has not yet been fully investigated due to the absence of disease models. To facilitate studies of this field, we constructed an in vitro blast lung injury model using alveolar epithelial cells. Methods: We randomly divided the alveolar epithelial cells into the control group and blast wave group, cells in the blast wave group were stimulated with different strengths of blast wave, and cells in the control group received sham intervention. Based on the standards we set up for a successful blast injury model, the optimal modeling conditions were studied on different frequencies of blast wave, modeling volume, cell incubation duration, and cell density. The changes of cell viability, apoptosis, intracellular oxidative stress, and inflammation were measured. Results: We found that cell viability decreased by approximately 50% at 6 h after exposing to 8 bar energy of blast wave, then increased with the extension of culture time and reached to (74.33 ± 9.44) % at 12 h. By applying 1000 ~ 2500 times of shock wave to 1 ~ 5 × 105 cells /ml, the changes of cell viability could well meet the modeling criteria. In parallel, the content of reactive oxide species (ROS), malonaldehyde (MDA), interleukin 18 (IL-18), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) increased in the blast wave group, while superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Glutathione -S- transferase (GST) decreased, which were highly consistent with that of human beings with gas explosion-induced pulmonary injury. Conclusion: An in vitro blast lung injury model is set up using a blast wave physiotherapy under 8 bar, 10 Hz blast wave on (1 ~ 5) ×105 alveolar epithelial cells for 1 000 times. This model is flexible, safe, and stable, and can be used for studies of lung injury caused by gas explosion and blast-associated other external forces.

Indexed as

Lung InjuryAlveolar Epithelial CellsHumansOxidative StressTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaalveolar epithelial cellsblast injurygas explosionlung injury modeloxidative stress response

Identifiers

PMID36620304
PMCPMC9816474
OpenAlexW4312175582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.