ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Health systems strengthening through policy-level integration of community health worker programs into national health systems for improved health outcomes - scorecard metrics validation: A bifactor structural equation model approach.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Subsequent to the demonstrated potential of community health workers (CHWs) in strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes, recent literature has defined context and guidelines for integrating CHW programs into mainstream health systems. However, quantitative measures for assessing the extent of CHW program integration into national health systems need to be developed. The purpose of this study was to validate a newly developed scale, Community Health Worker Program Integration Scorecard Metrics (CHWP-ISM), for assessing the degree of integration of CHW programs into national health systems in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Methods: Data obtained through a pilot study involving a purposively selected sample of 41 participants selected from populations involved in CHW programs work in selected countries of SSA formed the basis of a 31-item bifactor model. Data were collected between June and December 2019. By applying a latent variable approach implemented with structural equation modeling, data analysis was mainly done using the R statistical environment, applying factor analysis procedures. Results: Dimensionality, construct validity, and the CHWP-ISM scale's internal consistency were assessed. Confirmatory factor analysis of the CHW-ISM bifactor model supported a co-occurring CHW integration general factor and six unique domain-specific factors. Both the comparative fit index (CFI) and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) fit indices were above 0.9, while the root mean square of the residuals (RMSR) was 0.02. Cronbach's alpha (α), Guttman 6 (Lambda 6), and Omega total (ω Conclusion: Statistical significance of the bifactor model suggests that CHW integration has to be examined using factors that reflect a single common underlying integration construct, as well as factors that reflect unique variances for the identified six subject-specific domains. The validated CHWP-ISM could be useful to inform policy advisers, health systems, donors, non-governmental organizations, and other CHW program stakeholders with guidance on how to quantitatively assess the integration status of different components of CHW programs into respective critical functions of the health system. Improved integration could increase CHW program functionality, which could in turn strengthen the healthcare systems to improve health outcomes in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.