Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620194›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2022

Acquisition-dependent modulation of hippocampal neural cell adhesion molecules by associative motor learning.

Juan D Navarro-López, Ana Contreras, Katia Touyarot, Ana I Herrero, César Venero, Karine Cambon, Agnés Gruart, José M Delgado-García, Carmen Sandi, Lydia Jiménez-Díaz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Juan D Navarro-LópezLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, Facultad de Medicina de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Ana ContrerasLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, Facultad de Medicina de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Katia TouyarotINRAE, Bordeaux INP, NutriNeuro, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Ana I HerreroDepartment of Psychobiology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
César VeneroDepartment of Psychobiology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Karine CambonDirection de la Recherche Fondamentale (DRF), Institut François Jacob, MIRCen, Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.
Agnés GruartDivision of Neurosciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
José M Delgado-GarcíaDivision of Neurosciences, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Carmen SandiLaboratory of Behavioral Genetics, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lydia Jiménez-DíazLaboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, Facultad de Medicina de Ciudad Real, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain.
University of Castilla-La Mancha · ESNational University of Distance Education · ESUniversidad Pablo de Olavide · ESCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that some types of learning involve structural and functional changes of hippocampal synapses. Cell adhesion molecules neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), its polysialylated form polysialic acid to NCAM (PSA-NCAM), and L1 are prominent modulators of those changes. On the other hand, trace eyeblink conditioning, an associative motor learning task, requires the active participation of hippocampal circuits. However, the involvement of NCAM, PSA-NCAM, and L1 in this type of learning is not fully known. Here, we aimed to investigate the possible time sequence modifications of such neural cell adhesion molecules in the hippocampus during the acquisition of a trace eyeblink conditioning. To do so, the hippocampal expression of NCAM, PSA-NCAM, and L1 was assessed at three different time points during conditioning: after one (initial acquisition), three (partial acquisition), and six (complete acquisition) sessions of the conditioning paradigm. The conditioned stimulus (CS) was a weak electrical pulse separated by a 250-ms time interval from the unconditioned stimuli (US, a strong electrical pulse). An acquisition-dependent regulation of these adhesion molecules was found in the hippocampus. During the initial acquisition of the conditioning eyeblink paradigm (12 h after 1 and 3 days of training), synaptic expression of L1 and PSA-NCAM was transiently increased in the contralateral hippocampus to the paired CS-US presentations, whereas, when the associative learning was completed, such increase disappeared, but a marked and bilateral upregulation of NCAM was found. In conclusion, our findings show a specific temporal pattern of hippocampal CAMs expression during the acquisition process, highlighting the relevance of NCAM, PSA-NCAM, and L1 as learning-modulated molecules critically involved in remodeling processes underlying associative motor-memories formation.

Indexed as

associative motor learningclassical eyeblink conditioninghippocampusL1NCAMPSA-NCAMsynaptosomes

Identifiers

PMID36620194
PMCPMC9811386
OpenAlexW4313466909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.