Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620179›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Luo-Dan Qian, Li-Juan Feng, Shu-Xin Zhang, Jun Liu, Jia-Liang Ren, Lei Liu, Hui Zhang, Jigang Yang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. A multiparameter diagnostic model based on 2-[Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luo-Dan Qian *Nuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Li-Juan Feng *Nuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shu-Xin ZhangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun LiuNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jia-Liang RenGE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Lei LiuSinounion Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jigang YangNuclear Medicine Department, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Friendship Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a model combining a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( Methods: A total of 106 consecutive pediatric pNT patients confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed. Significant features determined by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish a clinical model (C-model), which included clinical parameters and PET/CT radiographic features. A radiomics model (R-model) was constructed on the basis of PET and CT images. A semiautomatic method was used for segmenting regions of interest. A total of 1,016 radiomics features were extracted. Univariate analysis and the least absolute shrinkage selection operator were then used to select significant features. The C-model was combined with the R-model to establish a combination model (RC-model). The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in both the training cohort and validation cohort. Results: The radiomics signature was constructed using 5 selected radiomics features. The RC-model, which was based on the 5 radiomics features and 3 clinical factors, showed better predictive performance compared with the C-model alone [area under the curve in the validation cohort: 0.908 Conclusions: In this preliminary single-center retrospective study, an R-model based on

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT)International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification (INPC)Peripheral neuroblastic tumor (pNT)radiomics

Identifiers

PMID36620179
PMCPMC9816755
OpenAlexW4310811817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.