Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620176›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023

Development of a novel nomogram-based model incorporating 3D radiomic signatures and lung CT radiological features for differentiating invasive adenocarcinoma from adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.

He Ren, Zhengguang Xiao, Chen Ling, Jiayi Wang, Shiyu Wu, Yanan Zeng, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

He Ren *Faculty of Medical Instrumentation, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Zhengguang Xiao *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chen Ling *Faculty of Medical Instrumentation, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi Wang *Anesthesiology Department of Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shiyu WuFaculty of Medical Instrumentation, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yanan ZengFaculty of Medical Instrumentation, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Ping LiFaculty of Medical Instrumentation, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is one of the most serious cancers in the world. Subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma can be quickly distinguished by analyzing 3D radiomic signatures and radiological features. Methods: This study included 493 patients from 3 hospitals with a total of 506 lesions confirmed as minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), or invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). After segmenting the lesion area, 3D radiomic signatures were extracted using the PyRadiomics package v. 3.0.1 implemented in Python (https://pyradiomics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html), and the corresponding radiological features were collected. Subsequently, the top 100 features were identified by feature screening methods, including the Spearman rank correlation and minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection, and the top 10 features were determined by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a nomogram incorporating 3D radiomic signatures and radiological features in the prediction system. The nomogram was evaluated from multiple perspectives and tested on the validation cohort. Results: The model combined 3 radiological features and seven 3D radiomic signatures. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was 0.877 (95% CI: 0.829-0.925) in the training cohort, 0.864 (95% CI: 0.789-0.940) in the testing cohort, and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.749-0.924) in the validation cohort. The nomogram applied in all 3 cohorts showed reliable accuracy and calibration. The decision curve also demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of the nomogram. Conclusions: In this study, a nomogram-based model combining 3D radiomic signatures and radiological features was developed. Its performance in identifying IAC and MIA/AIS was satisfactory and had clinical value.

Indexed as

3D radiomicscomputed tomographyinvasive adenocarcinoma (IAC)Lung adenocarcinomaradiological

Identifiers

PMID36620176
PMCPMC9816727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.