ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2023
Magnetic resonance-based radiomics nomogram for predicting microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preoperative risk assessment of invasive endometrial cancer using MRI-based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the quality of radiomics-based studies for endometrial cancer using RQS and METRICS tools.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- A radiomics model based on diffusion-weighted imaging developed using machine learning enables prediction of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Obstetric and Gynecological MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- ZOOMit diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- MRI-based radiomics model for predicting endometrial cancer with high tumor mutation burden.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Multi-sequence MRI-based clinical-radiomics models for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability-high status in endometrial cancer.Precision radiation oncology · 2025Article
- A prediction model based on deep learning and radiomics features of DWI for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of the effect of adenomyosis on determining the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a dual-center study.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Prognostic prediction of left ventricular myocardial noncompaction using machine learning and cardiac magnetic resonance radiomics.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) status is an important indicator for screening patients with endometrial cancer (EC) who have potential Lynch syndrome (LS) and may benefit from immunotherapy. This study aimed to develop a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics nomogram for the prediction of MSI status in EC. Methods: A total of 296 patients with histopathologically diagnosed EC were enrolled, and their MSI status was determined using immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. Patients were randomly divided into the training cohort (n=236) and the validation cohort (n=60) at a ratio of 8:2. To predict the MSI status in EC, the tumor radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, which in turn were selected using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm to build the radiomics signature (radiomics score; radscore) model. Five clinicopathologic characteristics were used to construct a clinicopathologic model. Finally, the nomogram model combining radscore and clinicopathologic characteristics was constructed. The performance of the three models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analyses (DCA). Results: Totals of 21 radiomics features and five clinicopathologic characteristics were selected to develop the radscore and clinicopathological models. The radscore and clinicopathologic models achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.752 and 0.600, respectively, in the training cohort; and of 0.723 and 0.615, respectively, in the validation cohort. The radiomics nomogram model showed improved discrimination efficiency compared with the radscore and clinicopathologic models, with an AUC of 0.773 and 0.740 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve analysis and DCA showed favorable calibration and clinical utility of the nomogram model. Conclusions: The nomogram incorporating MRI-based radiomics features and clinicopathologic characteristics could be a potential tool for the prediction of MSI status in EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.