Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620075›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2023

Cryopreserved anti-CD22 and bispecific anti-CD19/22 CAR T cells are as effective as freshly infused cells.

Alexandra Dreyzin, Sandhya R Panch, Haneen Shalabi, Bonnie Yates, Steven L Highfill, Ping Jin, David Stroncek, Nirali N Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-dimensional temporal mapping of CAR T cells reveals phenotypic and functional remodeling during manufacturing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra DreyzinCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
Sandhya R PanchDivision of Hematology, Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Haneen ShalabiPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Bonnie YatesPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Steven L HighfillDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cellular Engineering, Center for Cellular Engineering, NIH Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ping JinDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cellular Engineering, Center for Cellular Engineering, NIH Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
David StroncekDepartment of Transfusion Medicine and Cellular Engineering, Center for Cellular Engineering, NIH Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Nirali N ShahPediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Institutes of Health Clinical Center · USCenter for Cancer and Blood Disorders · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Immunotherapeutic approaches to treat pediatric hematologic malignanciesZIABC011823 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SHAH, NIRALI · 2019 to 2025
$6.1M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells facilitates shipment, timing of infusions, and storage of subsequent doses. However, reports on the impact of cryopreservation on CAR T cell efficacy have been mixed. We retrospectively compared clinical outcomes between patients who received cryopreserved versus fresh CAR T cells for treatment of B cell leukemia across two cohorts of pediatric and young adult patients: those who received anti-CD22 CAR T cells and those who received bispecific anti-CD19/22 CAR T cells. Manufacturing methods were consistent within each trial but differed between the two trials, allowing for exploration of cryopreservation within different manufacturing platforms. Among 40 patients who received anti-CD22 CAR T cells (21 cryopreserved cells and 19 fresh), there were no differences in

Indexed as

CAR TCAR T expansionCAR T manufacturingcell therapyclinical outcomescryopreservationcytokine release syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36620075
PMCPMC9798176
OpenAlexW4313419303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.