Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36620042›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Environmental changes affect the microbial release of hydrogen sulfide and methane from sediments at Boknis Eck (SW Baltic Sea).

Mirjam Perner, Klaus Wallmann, Nicole Adam-Beyer, Helmke Hepach, Katja Laufer-Meiser, Stefanie Böhnke, Isabel Diercks, Hermann W Bange, Daniela Indenbirken, Verena Nikeleit and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A novelISME communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mirjam PernerDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Klaus WallmannDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Nicole Adam-BeyerDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Helmke HepachDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Katja Laufer-MeiserDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Stefanie BöhnkeDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Isabel DiercksDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Hermann W BangeDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Daniela IndenbirkenLeibniz Institute of Virology, Hamburg, Germany.
Verena NikeleitDepartment of Geomicrobiology and Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Casey BryceDepartment of Geomicrobiology and Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas KapplerDepartment of Geomicrobiology and Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anja EngelDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
Florian ScholzDepartment of Marine Biogeochemistry, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Germany.
GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DELeibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) · DEUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic activities are modifying the oceanic environment rapidly and are causing ocean warming and deoxygenation, affecting biodiversity, productivity, and biogeochemical cycling. In coastal sediments, anaerobic organic matter degradation essentially fuels the production of hydrogen sulfide and methane. The release of these compounds from sediments is detrimental for the (local) environment and entails socio-economic consequences. Therefore, it is vital to understand which microbes catalyze the re-oxidation of these compounds under environmental dynamics, thereby mitigating their release to the water column. Here we use the seasonally dynamic Boknis Eck study site (SW Baltic Sea), where bottom waters annually fall hypoxic or anoxic after the summer months, to extrapolate how the microbial community and its activity reflects rising temperatures and deoxygenation. During October 2018, hallmarked by warmer bottom water and following a hypoxic event, modeled sulfide and methane production and consumption rates are higher than in March at lower temperatures and under fully oxic bottom water conditions. The microbial populations catalyzing sulfide and methane metabolisms are found in shallower sediment zones in October 2018 than in March 2019. DNA-and RNA profiling of sediments indicate a shift from primarily organotrophic to (autotrophic) sulfide oxidizing Bacteria, respectively. Previous studies using data collected over decades demonstrate rising temperatures, decreasing eutrophication, lower primary production and thus less fresh organic matter transported to the Boknis Eck sediments. Elevated temperatures are known to stimulate methanogenesis, anaerobic oxidation of methane, sulfate reduction and essentially microbial sulfide consumption, likely explaining the shift to a phylogenetically more diverse sulfide oxidizing community based on RNA.

Indexed as

anaerobic oxidation of methanehypoxiamarine sedimentsmicrobial sulfide oxidationsedimentary microbial communitysulfate reduction rates

Identifiers

PMID36620042
PMCPMC9822571
OpenAlexW4312172260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.