ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022
A lytic bacteriophage isolate reduced
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From laboratory to clinical application: a narrative review of bacteriophage therapy for antimicrobial-resistant infections in veterinary medicine.Veterinary research communications · 2026Review
- Toxinotyping, Antibiotic Resistance Profile, and In Vitro Bio-Control ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prophage: agent provocateur?Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Broad host range phages target globalMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Phage Delivery Strategies for Biocontrolling Human, Animal, and Plant Bacterial Infections: State of the Art.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Necrotic enteritis and antibiotic-free production of broiler chickens: Challenges in testing and using alternative products.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2024Review
- A comprehensive review of experimental models and induction protocols for avian necrotic enteritis over the past 2 decades.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Review
- Phage-Based Biosanitation Strategies for Minimizing PersistentAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bacteriophages are viral predators of bacteria and are common in nature. Their host-specific infections against specific bacteria make them an attractive natural agent to control bacterial pathogens. Interest in the potential of bacteriophages as antibacterial agents in the production animal industries has increased. Methods: A total of 18 bacteriophages were isolated from Australian commercial poultry environments, from which three highly active phages were chosen for enrichment. Sequencing libraries were prepared using a Nextera XT kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument using 2 × 300 bp paired-end chemistry. The sequence data were then assembled and aligned with a2 bacteriophage as the reference. An animal trial was performed by oral gavaging Results: The isolated bacteriophages only had only 96.7% similarity to the most closely related, previously characterized, Conclusion: These findings suggest that bacteriophage treatment is a promising approach to protect intestinal health from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.