Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619821›Full record

Article3 Biotech2023

Comparative docking studies of drugs and phytocompounds for emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Ananya Chugh, Ishita Sehgal, Nimisha Khurana, Kangna Verma, Rajan Rolta, Pranjal Vats, Deeksha Salaria, Olatomide A Fadare, Oladoja Awofisayo, Anita Verma and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Neuroprotective Efficacy of Phytoconstituents of Methanolic Shoots Extract ofEndocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Phytochemicals in Drug Discovery-A Confluence of Tradition and Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ananya Chugh *Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Ishita Sehgal *Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Nimisha Khurana *Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Kangna VermaSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Rajan RoltaDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Pranjal VatsSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK.
Deeksha SalariaDepartment of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, 160012 India.
Olatomide A FadareOrganic Chemistry Research Lab, Department of Chemistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun 220282 Nigeria.
Oladoja AwofisayoDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry, University of Uyo, Uyo, 520003 Nigeria.
Anita VermaSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Rajendra PhartyalSri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110021 India.
Mansi VermaDepartment of Zoology, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, 110007 India.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-9576
University of Delhi · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INObafemi Awolowo University · NGUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Uyo · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last three years, COVID-19 has impacted the world with back-to-back waves leading to devastating consequences. SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, was first detected in 2019 and since then has spread to 228 countries. Even though the primary focus of research groups was diverted to fight against COVID-19, yet no dedicated drug has been developed to combat the emergent life-threatening medical conditions. In this study, 35 phytocompounds and 43 drugs were investigated for comparative docking analysis. Molecular docking and virtual screening were performed against SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein of 13 variants using AutoDock Vina tool 1.5.6 and Discovery Studio, respectively, to identify the most efficient drugs. Selection of the most suitable compounds with the best binding affinity was done after screening for toxicity, ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) properties and drug-likeliness. The potential candidates were discovered to be Liquiritin (binding affinities ranging between -7.0 and -8.1 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) and Apigenin (binding affinities ranging between -6.8 and -7.3 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) based on their toxicity and consistent binding affinity with the Spike protein of all variants. The stability of the protein-ligand complex was determined using Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of Apigenin with the Delta plus variant of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, Liquiritin and Apigenin were also found to be less toxic than the presently used drugs and showed promising results based on in silico studies, though, confirmation using in vitro studies is required. This in-depth comparative investigation suggests potential drug candidates to fight against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03450-6.

Indexed as

COVID-19DockingDrug repurposingMD SimulationPhytocompoundsVariants

Identifiers

PMID36619821
PMCPMC9815891
OpenAlexW4313555546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.