Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619696›Full record

ArticleAnnals of operations research2023

Risk profiling of food security impediments using decision maker's behavioural preference towards operational risk management.

Rachita Gupta, Ravi Shankar, Kee-Hung Lai, Ajay Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of operations research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachita GuptaOperations Management & Decision Sciences, Indian Institute of Management Kashipur, Kashipur, Uttarakhand 244713 India.
Ravi ShankarDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Kee-Hung LaiDepartment of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, China.
Ajay KumarEMLYON Business School, Ecully, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8187-4169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For different decision makers, their approach towards management of operational risks differs due to difference in background and behavioural preferences. For such reasons, they attach different importance to various perspectives to manage operational risks. Present study conducts and analyses risk profiling of food security impediments, in which operational risk has come up as an important impediment. Based on three perspectives namely, social, economic, and operational, the research first evaluates severity of impediments in food security. Risk profiling is then conducted on the basis of decision makers' preferences towards different perspectives. Integration of fuzzy set theory and evidential reasoning algorithm along with decision makers' behavioural preferences have been used for the analysis. The proposed model generates a continuum of scenarios towards relative importance of three perspectives. It is observed that despite changing the importance of perspectives, a few risks show robustness in their severity, while other ones are sensitive to small changes. Based on these dynamic changes in risk-percept, insightful risk profiling is presented in this research. The risk profiling approach uniquely helps decision makers to adequately plan their course of actions to deal with operational risks associated with food security.

Indexed as

Evidential reasoning algorithmFood secure systemFood security impedimentsOperational risk planningRisk profiling

Identifiers

PMID36619696
PMCPMC9810523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.