Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619664›Full record

ArticleSocial network analysis and mining2023

Decision-making approaches in the antagonistic digital communication of the online communities users.

Solomiia Fedushko, Kateryna Molodetska, Yuriy Syerov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social network analysis and mining, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Solomiia FedushkoSocial Communication and Information Activity Department, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79000 Ukraine.
Kateryna MolodetskaDepartment of Computer Technologies and Systems Modeling, Polissia National University, Staryi Blvd., 7, Zhytomyr, 10008 Ukraine.
Yuriy SyerovSocial Communication and Information Activity Department, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79000 Ukraine.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18525Cancer Research UK 29018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The information space is an effective hybrid warfare tool on the web. This study investigated the decision-making process in the antagonistic digital communication of internet services users. Implementation of the proposed methods in this study minimized the negative impact of the spread of destructive content and actions of unfair competitors in the ecosystem of social internet services. The innovativeness of the suggested methods is the ability to make real-time decisions in a situation of antagonistic behavior of online users. The authors presented a model to secure user data, contributing to sustainable communicative interaction for its managers and users. This article presented approaches to decision-making by online community administrators under conditions of antagonistic behavior of the online services, which ensures the increase of efficiency of online communication. Timely and effective decision-making eliminated the negative impact of conflicts between communities and the spread of threats to users' information security. The algorithm of decision-making by users of stable internet services is suggested. This article contains examples of using the examined Wald and Savage criteria for making optimal decisions, confirmed by many experiments. The developed methods are tested on the online community on the social network Facebook. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13278-022-01021-4.

Indexed as

Antagonistic behaviorAntagonistic communicationDecision-makingDigitalInternetOnline communityOnline community userSocial internet servicesWeb

Identifiers

PMID36619664
PMCPMC9808702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.