ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2022
Mapping evidence on postpartum modern family planning service uptake among women in Ethiopia: A scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Utilization of postpartum family planning and associated factors among postpartum women attending five healthcare facilities in a rural district in Northern Uganda.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Ethiopia, different fragmented studies have been conducted to assess the determinants and uptake of postpartum modern family planning services. There is discrepancy and inconsistency among reported studies on postpartum modern family planning service uptake. The scoping review aimed to collect evidence on postnatal birth control service use and supply a chance to spot key ideas and gaps to research, policy revision, and changes in strategies. Methods: There were different process steps in this scoping review which included analysis questions, distinctive relevant studies, study choice, charting the information, and eventually collating, summarizing, and reporting the results. A search was conducted through scientific databases like PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Hinari, and Google Scholar. The first outcome of this scoping review was postpartum family planning service uptake after childbirth in Ethiopia. The Preferable Reporting Information in Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) flow diagram was used to select and summarize the selection procedure of the articles. The information of the chosen studies was sorted using the subsequent categories: authors, year of publication, study location, main study objective, and method employed for information analyses. Results: A total of 1,607 records were reclaimed from the database searches and reference list review. A total of 596 articles were identified in PubMed, 375 in CINAHL, 576 in Hinari, and 60 records in Google Scholar. A total of 1,607 literature studies were checked for replication, and 840 records were excluded. The bulk of articles ( Conclusion: Generally, this scoping review identified different fragmented and inconsistent research findings on the uptake of postpartum modern family planning in Ethiopia. Almost all studies were observational studies that lack interventional study designs to provide evidence-based interventions to improve postpartum family planning uptake. There is a definite need for further interventional and qualitative research to improve early postpartum family planning service uptake that improves maternal and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.