ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Volume-guarantee vs. pressure-limited ventilation in evolving bronchopulmonary dysplasia.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles in the Treatment of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia via Different Drug Delivery and Administration Routes.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extremely premature infants are at high risk for developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). While noninvasive support is preferred, they may require ventilator support. Although volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) has been shown to be beneficial in preventing BPD, no data exists to guide ventilator management of infants with evolving BPD. Thus, clinicians employ a host of ventilator strategies, traditionally time-cycled pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) and more recently volume-guarantee ventilation (VGV) (a form of VTV). In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that use of VGV in evolving BPD is associated with improved clinical and pulmonary outcomes when compared with PLV. Design: Single-center, retrospective cohort review of premature infants born less than 28 weeks inborn to a Level 4 NICU from January 2015 to December 2020. Data abstracted included demographics, maternal and birth data, and ventilator data until death or discharge. Exposure to either VGV or PLV was also examined, including ventilator "dose" (number of time points from DOL 14, 21 and 28 the patient was on that particular ventilator) during the period of evolving BPD. Results: Of a total of 471 patients with ventilation data available on DOL 14, 268 were not ventilated and 203 were ventilated. PLV at DOL 21 and 28 was associated with significantly higher risk of BPD and the composite outcome of BPD or death before 36 weeks compared to VGV. Both increasing VGV and PLV doses were significantly associated with higher odds of BPD and the composite outcome. For each additional time point of VGV and PLV exposure, the predicted length of stay (LOS) increased by 15.3 days ( Discussion: Our study demonstrates the association of use of VGV at DOL 21 and 28 with decreased risk of BPD compared to use of PLV. Prospective trials are needed to further delineate the most effective ventilatory modality for this population with "evolving" BPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.