ArticleHeliyon2022
Impact of treatment-duration-ratio of traditional Chinese medicine on survival period of primary liver cancer -A real-world study.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Thermo-Sensitive Polymeric Networks for Next-Generation Wound Management: A Review.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Complementary Chinese Herbal Medicine Use and Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Scoping Review of Usage Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Taiwanese Population-Based Studies.Current oncology reports · 2025Article
- Synthesis, biological activities and mechanistic studies of CMolecular diversity · 2025Review
- Research Hotspots of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Liver Cancer in the Future Directions: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence into the modernization of traditional Chinese medicine industry: a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In China, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is regarded as an effective treatment for primary liver cancer (PLC). The present study analyzed the effect of TCM on the survival period of patients with PLC by analyzing the relationship between the treatment-duration-ratio of traditional Chinese medicine (C-TDR, (traditional Chinese medicine treatment duration)/(Overall treatment duration) × 100%) and the survival time of 1002 patients with PLC. Methods: In this study, 1002 patients with PLC admitted to TCM Oncology Department of Changhai Hospital from January, 2015 to December, 2019 were enrolled. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression equation, propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for survival outcomes of PLC patients at different stages and estimate the influence of C-TDR on survival time. Results: Cox regression analysis indicated that C-TDR was an independent prognostic factor for survival outcome (P＜0.05) and a corresponding reduction of relative risk of death of 75.67% (relative risk (RR) = 0.2433; 95%Confedential Interval (CI) = 0.1747-0.3388). Similarly, it is also an independent prognostic factor for patients outcome of each stage (P＜0.05). The 251 patients of BCLC-A reduced 96.09% risk of mortality (RR = 0.0391; 95%CI = 0.0151-0.1012). The 396 BCLC-B patients decreased risk of death of 81.24% (RR = 0.1876, 95%CI = 0.1112-0.3163). Moreover, 355 patients of stage C demonstrated a 51.36% lower risk of death (RR = 1.0016, 95%CI = 0.9885-1.0149). Significant differences were found in the median overall survival (OS) both higher and lower C-TDR of all patients. Even after PSM, the overall survival of two groups were significantly improved following each stage. Conclusion: Earlier administration of traditional Chinese medicine can reduce the risk of mortality and prolong survival in patients with liver cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.