Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619414›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Controversy on the toxic nature of deep eutectic solvents and their potential contribution to environmental pollution.

Guillermo Martínez Martínez, Gabriela Guillena Townley, Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guillermo Martínez MartínezBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Division, Agrochemistry and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ap. 99, E-03080, Alicante, Spain.
Gabriela Guillena TownleyOrganic Chemistry Department and Organic Synthesis Institute (ISO), University of Alicante, Ap. 99, E-03080, Alicante, Spain.
Rosa María Martínez-EspinosaBiochemistry and Molecular Biology Division, Agrochemistry and Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Sciences, Ap. 99, E-03080, Alicante, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep eutectic solvents (DES) are promising reaction media where interesting catalytic processes can be carried out. In theory, most of these mixtures are environmentally friendly, being an alternative to traditionally pollutant organic solvents used in several processes related to organic chemistry and biotechnology. However, recent studies show contradictory results regarding their toxicity. The method selected to perform toxicity studies could be significantly conditioned by some of the physical properties displayed by the DESs. Also, the metabolic capabilities of the organisms/cells used to monitor their toxicity are influenced by their physical properties. In this review, relevant physical-chemical properties for toxicity studies are summarized. The advantages/disadvantages of the used tests to monitor their toxicity and biodegradability in connection with the chosen organisms/cells are discussed, shedding light on their limitations. These findings could be taken as a starting point for designing more accurate DESs toxicity studies covering a wider spectrum of organisms and cells to be used as biomodels to monitor environmental pollution caused by DESs.

Indexed as

BiodegradabilityDeep eutectic solventsEcotoxicityNatural deep eutectic solventsSustainability

Identifiers

PMID36619414
PMCPMC9813709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.