Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619408›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Cultural ecology cognition and heritage value of huizhou traditional villages.

Qunli Fang, Zao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qunli FangSchool of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Huangshan University, Huangshan 2450412, China.
Zao LiAnhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230000 China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heritage value is a prerequisite for protecting and utilising traditional villages. In response to the unclear definition of heritage value, this study develops a conceptual model and an indicator system of traditional village heritage value based on cultural ecology. Additionally, the study analyses heritage value using a three-dimensional matrix model and cluster analysis. The results show significant differences in the heritage value of Huizhou traditional villages. High heritage values are mainly distributed in Yi County and She County, while low heritage values are mainly distributed at the edges of the region. Among the diversity, continuity and integrity differences, the integrity difference is the highest, and is reflected in the quality of heritage ontology and the relationship between heritage ontology and the surrounding environment. In addition, four types of Huizhou traditional villages are identified: resource single type, inheritance dilemma type, quality dilemma type, and heritage vitality type. Utilisation strategies are proposed for the four types to guide the classified management of traditional villages.

Indexed as

AHP methodCluster analysisHeritage evaluationProblem-orientedType

Identifiers

PMID36619408
PMCPMC9816767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.