ArticleMethodsX2023
Stochastic Bayesian Runge-Kutta method for dengue dynamic mapping.
Article in MethodsX, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever (DHF) is still a threat to humanity that cause death and disability due to changes in environmental and socioeconomic conditions, especially in tropical areas. A critical assessment of the models and methods is necessary. The vital role of stochastic processes of infectious disease research in Bayesian statistical models helps provide an explicit framework for understanding disease transmission dynamics between hosts (humans) and vectors (mosquitoes). This research presents a Bayesian stochastic process for the cross-infection SIR-SI model as a differential equation (susceptibility-infection-recovery for the human population; susceptible-infectious for the vector population) for the dynamic transmission of DHF. Given the difficulties of solving the differential equations precisely, we propose a computational model to approach the solution based on the Runge-Kutta family approach, namely the Euler and the four-order Runge-Kutta methods. The methods used for the discretization process of the SIR-SI model for computational process needs. For comparison purposes, we use a monthly DHF dataset of 10 Kendari, Indonesia, districts from 2019 to 2021. Parameter estimation of the Bayesian SIR-SI model based on the Euler and four-order Runge-Kutta method was updated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Bayesian. The Euler and four-order Runge-Kutta methods have converged at 10,000 iterations with burn-in 80,000. The numerical simulation results show that the four-order Runge-Kutta approach has the slightest deviance, 106.5. Therefore, this approach is the best one. The relative risk analysis shows that the dynamics of DHF cases fluctuate from January to July every year. However, from January to May, there was a high consistency of DHF cases. Two districts with high case consistency were found, namely Kadia and Wua-Wua. Furthermore, because the spread of DHF cases has a spatial effect, the Kadia and Wua-Wua districts need serious attention to suppress the rate of reach of DHF in Kendari City. Intensive observation and intervention in the Kadia and Wua-Wua districts should be carried out in early January to stop the breeding of mosquito larvae. In other neighbourhoods such as Puwatu, Kambu and Kendari Barat, the DHF cases occur temporally as the impacts of DHF cases in the Kadia and Wua-Wua districts. It may facilitate the statisticians to develop further models to adopt a better understanding to control the DHF dynamically. In brief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.