Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619288›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2023

Pilot testing and optimization of a larval fathead minnow high throughput transcriptomics assay.

Daniel L Villeneuve, Michelle Le, Monique Hazemi, Adam Biales, David C Bencic, Kendra Bush, Robert Flick, John Martinson, Mackenzie Morshead, Kelvin Santana Rodriguez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioactivity of the ubiquitous tire preservative 6PPD and degradant, 6PPD-quinone in fish- and mammalian-based assays.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel L VilleneuveUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Michelle LeOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participant, US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Monique HazemiOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participant, US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Adam BialesUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
David C BencicUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
Kendra BushOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participant, US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Robert FlickUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
John MartinsonUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA.
Mackenzie MorsheadOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participant, US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Kelvin Santana RodriguezOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) Research Participant, US Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Kelsey VitenseUS Environmental Protection Agency, Scientific Computing and Data Curation Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Kevin FlynnUS Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division, Duluth, MN 55804, USA.
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concentrations at which global gene expression profiles in cells or animals exposed to a test substance start to differ significantly from those of controls have been proposed as an alternative point of departure for use in screening level hazard assessment. The present study describes pilot testing of a high throughput compatible transcriptomics assay with larval fathead minnows. One day post hatch fathead minnows were exposed to eleven different concentrations of three metals, three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and four neonicotinoid-like compounds for 24 h and concentration response modeling was applied to whole body gene expression data. Transcriptomics-based points of departure (tPODs) were consistently lower than effect concentrations reported in apical endpoint studies in fish. However, larval fathead minnow-based tPODs were not always lower than concentrations reported to elicit apical toxicity in other aquatic organisms like crustaceans or insects. Random

Indexed as

Benchmark doseBMD, Benchmark dosecDNA, Complementary DNAComputational toxicologyDEGs, Differentially expressed geneseco-HTTr, Ecological high throughput transcriptomicsECOTOX knowledgebaseFishHTTr, High throughput transcriptomicsRIN, RNA integrity numberRNAseq, RNA sequencingRNA sequencingSSRI, Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitorToxCast, US EPA Toxicity ForecastertPOD, Transcriptomics-based point of departureTranscriptomics-based point of departure

Identifiers

PMID36619288
PMCPMC9816907
OpenAlexW4313334258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.