Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619252›Full record

ArticleDiscover education2023

Exploring the activities and outcomes of digital teaching and learning of practical skills in higher education for the social and health care professions: a scoping review.

Anne Söderlund, Aurelija Blazeviciene, Maria Elvén, Alina Vaskelyte, Raimonds Strods, Inguna Blese, Heikki Paakkonen, Antonio Fernandes, Daniela Cardoso, Sultan Kav and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Discover education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. E-learning Challenges among Healthcare Students: A Scoping Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anne SöderlundSection of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4537-030X
Aurelija BlazevicieneDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-2130-5615
Maria ElvénSection of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5356-916X
Alina VaskelyteDepartment of Nursing, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-2705-4407
Raimonds StrodsCentre for Educational Growth, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-9283
Inguna BleseCentre for Educational Growth, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-5331-196X
Heikki PaakkonenSchool of Business and Health Care, Arcada University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-6995
Antonio FernandesHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-5968
Daniela CardosoHealth Sciences Research Unit: Nursing, Nursing School of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1425-885X
Sultan KavFaculty of Health Sciences, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0361-7498
Cigdem BaskiciFaculty of Health Sciences, Başkent University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0712-1481
Camilla Wiktsröm-GrotellSection of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Box 883, 721 23 Västerås, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2312-3612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Higher education for health care professionals faces numerous challenges. It is important to develop and apply methods supporting education, especially the practical skills. This scoping review aimed to explore the activities and learning outcomes of digital technology in practical skills teaching and learning in higher education for the social and health professions. Scoping review recommendations and the PRISMA-ScR checklist were applied. Randomized controlled trials published between 2016 and 2021 involving students in higher education who were taking courses in the social sciences and health care and reported interventions with digital technology activities and practices in practical teaching and learning were included. The CINAHL Plus, PubMed, Scopus, ERIC, and Sociological Abstracts/Social Services Abstracts databases were searched. Teaching methods were blended, e-learning or other online-based, and digital simulation-based activities. Teaching and learning environments, methods, resources, and activity characteristics varied, making a summary difficult. Interventions were developed in a face-to-face format prior to digitalization. The outcomes were measured at the knowledge level, not at the performance level. One-third of the studies showed a significant improvement in practical skills in the intervention group in comparison to the control conditions. The use of digital technology in the learning and teaching process have potential to develop of students' skills, knowledge, motivation, and attitudes. The pedagogy of technology use is decisive. The development of new digital methods for teaching and learning practical skills requires the engagement of students and teachers, in addition the researchers.

Indexed as

Digital learningDigital simulationDigital teachingHealth professionHigher educationPractical skills

Identifiers

PMID36619252
PMCPMC9809526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.