Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619228›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of medical sciences2023

Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 recombinants and emerging Omicron sublineages.

Yuliang Wang, Yiyin Long, Feng Wang, Changlin Li, Wei Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of medical sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Respiratory pathogenic microbial infections: a narrative review.International journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Editorial: The XBB.1.5 ('Kraken') Subvariant of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and its Rapid Global Spread.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuliang WangTianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yiyin LongTianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Feng WangDepartment of Genetics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Changlin LiTianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Wei LiuTianjin Children's Hospital, Children's Hospital, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is currently the predominant circulating variant in the COVID-19 pandemic. The dominating Omicron sublineages respond to host immune pressure and develop advantageous mutations or genetic recombination, which result in variants that are more contagious or better at escaping immune responses in response to previous infection or vaccination. Meanwhile, multiple genetic recombination events have been reported in coinfection cases, the majority of which have resulted from the recombination between co-circulating Omicron BA.1 (or BA.1.1) and Delta variant or BA.2. Here, we review the knowledge and characterization of recombination for SARS-CoV-2 at the population level, provide an update on the occurrence of newly circulating Omicron sublineages, and discuss the effectiveness of novel vaccines/therapeutic drugs against the Omicron variant.

Indexed as

CoinfectionCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2BA.5COVID-19OmicronrecombinantSARS-CoV-2vaccine

Identifiers

PMID36619228
PMCPMC9812801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.