Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619217›Full record

ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2023

Development of Tier 2 LC-MRM-MS protein quantification methods for liquid biopsies.

Nina Diederiks, Cor J Ravensbergen, Maxim Treep, Madelein van Wezel, Matt Kuruc, L Renee Ruhaak, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Christa M Cobbaert, Yuri E M van der Burgt, Wilma E Mesker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Clinical Glyco(proteo)mics in Precision Medicine.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina DiederiksDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Cor J RavensbergenDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Maxim TreepDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Madelein van WezelDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Matt KurucBiotech Support Group LLC, 1 Deer Park Drive, Suite M, Monmouth Junction, NJ 08852, USA.
L Renee RuhaakDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rob A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Christa M CobbaertDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Yuri E M van der BurgtDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Wilma E MeskerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the pursuit of personalized diagnostics and tailored treatments, quantitative protein tests contribute to a more precise definition of health and disease. The development of new quantitative protein tests should be driven by an unmet clinical need and performed in a collaborative effort that involves all stakeholders. With regard to the analytical part, mass spectrometry (MS)-based platforms are an excellent tool for quantification of specific proteins in body fluids, for example focused on cancer. The obtained readouts have great potential in determining tumor aggressiveness to facilitate treatment decisions, and can furthermore be used to monitor patient response. Internationally standardized TNM classifications of malignant tumors are beneficial for diagnosis, however treatment outcome and survival of cancer patients is poorly predicted. To this end, the importance of the tumor microenvironment has endorsed the introduction of the tumor-stroma ratio as a prognostic parameter in solid primary tumor types. Currently, the stromal content of tumor tissues is determined via routine diagnostic pathology slides. With the development of liquid chromatography (LC)-MS methods we aim at quantification of tumor-stroma specific proteins in body fluids. In this mini-review the analytical aspect of this developmental trajectory is further detailed.

Indexed as

Cancer proteomicsClinical chemistryLiquid biopsyProtein quantificationTumor-stroma ratio

Identifiers

PMID36619217
PMCPMC9811211
OpenAlexW4312108481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.