ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced hemostasis and bone regeneration achieved by thrombin-simvastatin-polydopamine loaded spray-dried β-TCP/ gelatin/ soy protein isolate biocomposites in critical rat calvarial defects.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- 3D printed porous magnesium metal scaffolds with bioactive coating for bone defect repair: enhancing angiogenesis and osteogenesis.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Article
- Research progress on the role and mechanism of magnesium-containing materials in bone repair.Biomaterials translational · 2025Review
- Mg alloys with antitumor and anticorrosion properties for orthopedic oncology: A review from mechanisms to application strategies.APL bioengineering · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Gelatin/Hyaluronic Acid-Generated Bridging in a 3D-Printed Titanium Cage for Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
- Novel Phosphate Conversion Coating with Superior Corrosion Resistance on the Mg-Al-RE Alloy Based on the Introduction of Silane.ACS omega · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium and its alloys are widely applied biomaterials due to their biodegradability and biocompatibility. However, rapid degradation and hydrogen gas evolution hinder its applicability on a commercial scale. In this study, we developed an Mg alloy bone plate for bone remodeling and support after a fracture. We further coated the Mg alloy plate with Sr-D-Ca-P (Sr dopped Ca-P coating) and Sr-D-Ca-P/PLLA-HAp to evaluate and compare their biodegradability and biocompatibility in both
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.