ReviewCurrent research in neurobiology2023
Microscale multicircuit brain stimulation: Achieving real-time brain state control for novel applications.
Review in Current research in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring synergies: Advancing neuroscience with machine learning.Signal processing · 2026Article
- Intracortical Microstimulation in Brain-Computer Interfaces: Evoking Perception and Plasticity.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Brain-computer interfaces as a causal probe for scientific inquiry.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Computer vision detects covert voluntary facial movements in unresponsive brain injury patients.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Gap Analysis and Scientific Roadmap.Neurocritical care · 2024Review
- Living-Neuron-Based Autogenerator.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurological and psychiatric disorders typically result from dysfunction across multiple neural circuits. Most of these disorders lack a satisfactory neuromodulation treatment. However, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been successful in a limited number of disorders; DBS typically targets one or two brain areas with single contacts on relatively large electrodes, allowing for only coarse modulation of circuit function. Because of the dysfunction in distributed neural circuits - each requiring fine, tailored modulation - that characterizes most neuropsychiatric disorders, this approach holds limited promise. To develop the next generation of neuromodulation therapies, we will have to achieve fine-grained, closed-loop control over multiple neural circuits. Recent work has demonstrated spatial and frequency selectivity using microstimulation with many small, closely-spaced contacts, mimicking endogenous neural dynamics. Using custom electrode design and stimulation parameters, it should be possible to achieve bidirectional control over behavioral outcomes, such as increasing or decreasing arousal during central thalamic stimulation. Here, we discuss one possible approach, which we term microscale multicircuit brain stimulation (MMBS). We discuss how machine learning leverages behavioral and neural data to find optimal stimulation parameters across multiple contacts, to drive the brain towards desired states associated with behavioral goals. We expound a mathematical framework for MMBS, where behavioral and neural responses adjust the model in real-time, allowing us to adjust stimulation in real-time. These technologies will be critical to the development of the next generation of neurostimulation therapies, which will allow us to treat problems like disorders of consciousness and cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.