ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Accelerating the science and practice of psychology beyond WEIRD biases: Enriching the landscape through Asian psychology.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relational Well-Being in Non-WEIRD Societies: A Reformulation of Happiness From a Chinese Cultural Perspective.PsyCh journal · 2026Article
- The seven virtues ofPNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Cohort update: waves 2 and 3 of the global flourishing study.European journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- The psychometric network of individual flourishing across nationally representative samples from 22 countries.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Survey sampling design in wave 1 of the Global Flourishing Study.European journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Development of the Self-DirectedBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Childhood Predictors of Dispositional Forgivingness in Adulthood: A Cross-National Analysis with 22 Countries.Applied research in quality of life · 2025Article
- Commentary: Accelerating the science and practice of psychology beyond WEIRD biases: enriching the landscape through Asian psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Editorial: A new science of suffering, the wisdom of the soul, and the new behavioral economics of happiness: towards a general theory of well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Varieties of suffering in the clinical setting: re-envisioning mental health beyond the medical model.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- More spiritual than religious: Concurrent and longitudinal relations with personality traits, mystical experiences, and other individual characteristics.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than a decade has passed since major concerns emerged about the WEIRD-centric focus of mainstream psychological science. Since then, many calls have been made for the discipline of psychology (and other disciplines within the social sciences) to become more broadly representative of the human species. However, recent evidence suggests that progress toward improving the inclusivity and generalizability of psychological science has been slow, and that the dominance of WEIRD psychology has persisted. To build a more comprehensive psychological science that truly represents the global population, we need strategies that can facilitate more rapid expansion of empirical evidence in psychology beyond WEIRD biases. In this paper, we draw on several examples (i.e., non-duality and dialectical interaction, Wu-Wei, Zhong Yong) to illustrate how principles of Asian psychology could contribute to reshaping mainstream psychology. We discuss some strategies for advancing a global psychological science, along with some complementary practical suggestions that could enrich the WEIRD-centric landscape of current psychological science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.