ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-efficacy was considered as a promising target for the self-management of symptoms for adolescents with asthma. The measurement of self-efficacy in adolescents with asthma requires effective self-report tools, which have not been met with at present. So, the aim of this study was to cross-culturally validate the Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (AASEQ). Methods: As many as 408 adolescents with asthma were invited to take up the psychometric properties test between July 2021 and June 2022. We conducted the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to determine the structure of the AASEQ. The relationship between the AASEQ and General Self-Efficacy Scale was tested to evaluate the construct validity. The reliability was evaluated by retest reliability, internal consistency, and interfactor correlation. Results: The results of the present study showed that the confirmatory factor analysis indicated a significantly good fit for a four-factor model, which explained 62.697% of the total variance. The fit indices of the four-factor model were acceptable, and the standardized factor loading ranged from 0.631 to 0.880. The C-AASEQ showed an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.810-0.927) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.64-0.89). Content validity index at the scale level was 0.96, and content validity index at the item level was 0.86 to 1. Conclusion: The Chinese version of Adolescent Asthma Self-Efficacy Questionnaire showed consistently acceptable positive psychometric properties and can be used as an instrument to assess the self-efficacy of adolescents with asthma in China, as corroborated in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.