Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619028›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Were there losses in social support during the pandemic? Testing the impact of COVID-19 on psychological adjustment to trauma in United States adults.

Benjamin J Mitchell, Emily A Gawlik, Brittany J Baugher, Richard L George, Farid F Muakkassa, Ali F Mallat, John Gunstad, Douglas L Delahanty, Karin G Coifman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin J MitchellDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Emily A GawlikDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Brittany J BaugherDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Richard L GeorgeSumma Health Systems, Akron, OH, United States.
Farid F MuakkassaCleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, United States.
Ali F MallatCleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, OH, United States.
John GunstadDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Douglas L DelahantyDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.
Karin G CoifmanDepartment of Psychological Science and Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH, United States.

Funding

Unpacking Emotion Inflexibility and Prospective Prediction of Affective DiseaseR01MH113622 · NIMH · KENT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI COIFMAN, KARIN GALIAH · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Social support is a key protective factor in the psychological adjustment of individuals to traumatic events. However, since March 2020, extant research has revealed evidence of increased loneliness, social isolation, and disconnection, likely due to COVID-19 pandemic-related recommendations that restricted day-to-day contact with others. Methods: In this investigation, we applied a case-control design to test the direct impacts of the pandemic on social support in United States adults recovering from a significant injury caused by PTSD-qualifying, traumatic events (e.g., motor vehicle crashes, violence, etc.). We compared individuals who experienced trauma during the pandemic, the "cases" recruited and evaluated between December 2020 to April 2022, to trauma-exposed "controls," recruited and evaluated pre-pandemic, from August 2018 through March 9, 2020 (prior to changes in public health recommendations in the region). Cohorts were matched on key demographics (age, sex, education, race/ethnicity, income) and injury severity variables. We tested to see if there were differences in reported social support over the first 5 months of adjustment, considering variable operationalizations of social support from social network size to social constraints in disclosure. Next, we tested to see if the protective role of social support in psychological adjustment to trauma was moderated by cohort status to determine if the impacts of the pandemic extended to changes in the Results: The results of our analyses suggested that there were no significant cohort differences, meaning that whether prior to or during the pandemic, individuals reported similar levels of social support that were generally protective, and similar levels of psychological symptoms. However, there was some evidence of moderation by cohort status when examining the process of adjustment. Specifically, when examining symptoms of post-traumatic stress over time, individuals adjusting to traumatic events during COVID-19 received less benefit from social support. Discussion: Although negative mental health implications of the pandemic are increasingly evident, it has not been clear how the pandemic impacted normative psychological adjustment processes. These results are one of the first direct tests of the impact of COVID-19 on longitudinal adjustment to trauma and suggest some minimal impacts.

Indexed as

COVID-19depressionpost-traumatic stresspsychological adjustmentsocial supporttrauma

Identifiers

PMID36619028
PMCPMC9813403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.