Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36619001›Full record

ArticleEthik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin2023

[Between trivialization and pathologization: Healthcare in old age and the temporal structure of a good life].

Mark Schweda, Eva Hummers, Evelyn Kleinert

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Ethik in der Medizin : Organ der Akademie fur Ethik in der Medizin, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark SchwedaAbteilung Ethik in der Medizin, Department für Versorgungsforschung, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstr. 114-118, 26129 Oldenburg, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-6561
Eva HummersInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-6067
Evelyn KleinertInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-9874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definition of problem: Modern medicine is challenging traditional views of age(ing). What was long considered a "normal" sign of old age is now often perceived and treated as a disease. As a result, age-related health standards and treatment goals are shifting. The resulting scope between trivialization and pathologization of age(ing) requires ethical reflection. Argument: This article explores the question of how notions of age(ing) are to be understood ethically in the context of medicine. We first provide an overview of the state of research on the role of age stereotypes in the healthcare of older people. The notions of age(ing) identified in this context are then analyzed from the perspective of teleological ethics. Conclusions: What kinds of healthcare are reasonable and appropriate in old age has to be discussed in the context of the temporal structure of a good life.

Indexed as

AgeingGood lifeHealthcareTeleological ethicsTemporality

Identifiers

PMID36619001
PMCPMC9812344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.