Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618896›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Predicting 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely preterm infants using graphical network and machine learning approaches.

Sandra E Juul, Thomas R Wood, Kendell German, Janessa B Law, Sarah E Kolnik, Mihai Puia-Dumitrescu, Ulrike Mietzsch, Semsa Gogcu, Bryan A Comstock, Sijia Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Importance of human milk for infants in the clinical setting: Updates and mechanistic links.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sandra E JuulDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thomas R WoodDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kendell GermanDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Janessa B LawDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sarah E KolnikDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mihai Puia-DumitrescuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ulrike MietzschDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Semsa GogcuDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine, NC, USA.
Bryan A ComstockDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sijia LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Dennis E MayockDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Patrick J HeagertyDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
PENUT Consortium

Funding

Transform Dissemination and Implementation Science in CTSA ProgramsUL1TR002319 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI John K. Amory · 2017 to 2026
$100.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infants born extremely preterm (<28 weeks' gestation) are at high risk of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) with 50% of survivors showing moderate or severe NDI when at 2 years of age. We sought to develop novel models by which to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes, hypothesizing that combining baseline characteristics at birth with medical care and environmental exposures would produce the most accurate model. Methods: Using a prospective database of 692 infants from the Preterm Epo Neuroprotection (PENUT) Trial, which was carried out between December 2013 and September 2016, we developed three predictive algorithms of increasing complexity using a Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART) machine learning approach to predict both NDI and continuous Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd ed subscales at 2 year follow-up using: 1) the 5 variables used in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Extremely Preterm Birth Outcomes Tool, 2) 21 variables associated with outcomes in extremely preterm (EP) infants, and 3) a hypothesis-free approach using 133 potential variables available for infants in the PENUT database. Findings: The NICHD 5-variable model predicted 3-4% of the variance in the Bayley subscale scores, and predicted NDI with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUROC, 95% CI) of 0.62 (0.56-0.69). Accuracy increased to 12-20% of variance explained and an AUROC of 0.77 (0.72-0.83) when using the 21 pre-selected clinical variables. Hypothesis-free variable selection using BART resulted in models that explained 20-31% of Bayley subscale scores and AUROC of 0.87 (0.83-0.91) for severe NDI, with good calibration across the range of outcome predictions. However, even with the most accurate models, the average prediction error for the Bayley subscale predictions was around 14-15 points, leading to wide prediction intervals. Higher total transfusion volume was the most important predictor of severe NDI and lower Bayley scores across all subscales. Interpretation: While the machine learning BART approach meaningfully improved predictive accuracy above a widely used prediction tool (NICHD) as well as a model utilizing NDI-associated clinical characteristics, the average error remained approximately 1 standard deviation on either side of the true value. Although dichotomous NDI prediction using BART was more accurate than has been previously reported, and certain clinical variables such as transfusion exposure were meaningfully predictive of outcomes, our results emphasize the fact that the field is still not able to accurately predict the results of complex long-term assessments such as Bayley subscales in infants born EP even when using rich datasets and advanced analytic methods. This highlights the ongoing need for long-term follow-up of all EP infants. Funding: Supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeU01NS077953 and U01NS077955.

Indexed as

Extreme prematurityneurodevelopmental impairmentOutcomesprediction

Identifiers

PMID36618896
PMCPMC9813758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.