ArticleScientometrics2023
The impact of Jürgen Habermas's scientific production: a scientometric review.
Article in Scientometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- ACL reconstruction postoperative rehabilitation in China: a bibliometrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Pooled it
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and global perspectives on lung large cell neuroendocrine cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Global Research Trends in Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: A Web of Science-Based Bibliometric Analysis (2000-2024).Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Visualizing Scholarly Trends in Electronic Health (eHealth) Business Models: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
- A Century of Mathematical Epidemiology: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Research Trends.Cureus · 2024Review
- Exploring the Frontiers of Mathematical Neuroscience: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Exploring the Intersection of E-commerce and Healthcare: A Visual Analysis of Research Trends.Cureus · 2024Review
- Mapping Research Trends and Collaborative Networks in Swarm Intelligence for Healthcare Through Visualization.Cureus · 2024Review
- Mapping the research landscape: A bibliometric analysis of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Review
- Emerging Themes and Research Frontiers in Suicide Prediction: A Scientometric Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of bibliometrics, based on statistical and mathematical tools, makes it possible to measure the contributions of researchers to science. This is a widely used tool to assess scientific production in several areas of knowledge. Such methodology analyzes publication trends, author networks, structures of co-citation, journals and even the scientific contribution of renowned scholars in science. The precursor of bibliometrics, Eugene Garfield, who proposes the retrieval of information from the indexing of citations, was the object of a scientometric review aimed at assessing his impact on science. Given such relevance, this article presents the academic contribution of Jürgen Habermas based on a preliminary scientometric review of his studies. Jürgen Habermas is regarded not only as an active scholar in the social and political process, but also as a productive, controversial and influential contemporary author. The correct understanding of his works is a great challenge, as the bases of his thinking are so broad that they allow an interface between different approaches. We elaborated a design of his scientific work with the advancement to a connection between his main ideas through the use of bibliometric software. Bibliometrics, of the scientometric type, allows the understanding of how recognized patterns in citations can develop information relevant to the scientific field. The results confirm the multidisciplinary contribution of Habermas's studies and highlight his main fields of research and works, which serve as a foundation for clearly understanding and applying his concepts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.