ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Geometrical analysis of the opening gap after tibial condylar valgus osteotomy for proper hinge point selection.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digitized Precision Corrective Osteotomy for Treating Knee Joint Deformities: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative deformity and hinge position are associated with the magnitude of the gap opening during corrective osteotomy. A larger opening gap angle is associated with a higher risk of complications. This cross-sectional study sought to identify a suitable hinge position that results in the smallest opening angle during tibial condylar valgus osteotomy (TCVO). Methods: The data of 66 arthritic knees treated by TCVO were included, comprising 16 knees with the hinge points selected medial to the center (group M), 21 knees with the hinge points selected at the center (group C), and 29 knees with the hinge points selected lateral to the center of the intercondylar eminence (group L). The opening gap angles and the correction amounts of the medial proximal tibial angle ( Results: The average Conclusions: The hinge point at the lateral beak of the intercondylar eminence results in the smallest opening angle and may be suitable for TCVO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.