Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618794›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022

Development and validation of a random forest model for predicting radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer patients receiving moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Yang Zhang, Zongjuan Li, Han Xiao, Zhenjiang Li, Jian He, Shisuo Du, Zhaochong Zeng

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yang Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zongjuan Li *Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and Thoracic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Han XiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenjiang LiDepartment of Radiation Physics, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Jian HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shisuo DuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaochong ZengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shandong First Medical University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is a type of toxicity commonly associated with thoracic radiation therapy. We sought to establish a random forest (RF) model and evaluate its ability to predict RP in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT). Methods: A total of 106 patients with stage II-IVa NSCLC who received moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy (2.3-3.0 Gy/fraction) at Zhongshan Hospital were included. All enrolled patients were divided chronologically into the training (67 patients) and validation (39 patients) groups. Higher than or equal to grade 2 RP was defined as the end point. Logistic regression and RF models were established and compared using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and a confusion matrix in the training and validation groups. Results: The cumulative incidence of the end point was 25.4% and 17.9% in the training and validation groups, respectively. Logistic regression models were constructed by dosage parameters of total lungs, ipsilateral or contralateral lungs, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that the dosimetric factors of total lungs yielded a superior classification performance than did that of the ipsilateral or contralateral lungs [area under the curve (AUC) =0.920, AUC =0.701, and AUC =0.661, respectively]. Furthermore, the RF model yielded a better prediction capacity than did the traditional logistic model based on the dosimetric factors of the total lungs (accuracy: 88.06%; precision: 84.62%; sensitivity: 64.71%; specificity: 96.00%). Moreover, the RF identified mean lung dose [MLD; mean decrease gini (MDG) =5.74], V20 (MDG =4.62), and V35 (MDG =3.08) of total lungs as the most common primary differentiators of RP. Conclusions: Our RF model established based on the dosimetric parameters of the total lungs could accurately predict the RP risk in patients with NSCLC treated with moderately hypofractionated tomotherapy.

Indexed as

hypofractionated radiotherapyNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)radiation pneumonitis (RP)random forest (RF)

Identifiers

PMID36618794
PMCPMC9816857
OpenAlexW4311852117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.