ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Impact of the type of initial intervention on the outcomes of lung volume reduction for emphysema: a propensity matched study.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The safety and efficacy of lung volume reduction surgery: A 25-year single institution experience.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Is pulmonary hypertension still a contraindication for lung volume reduction?-a narrative review of contemporary evidence.Annals of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Integrating interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery: a multidisciplinary approach to advanced pulmonary care.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Lung volume reduction for severe emphysema: scalpel or bronchoscope?Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The type of initial intervention i.e., endobronchial valve (EBV) implantation or lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) to be offered as initial intervention remains vague in the treatment of emphysema-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes of EBV with that of LVRS in emphysema patients who could have both offered as an initial intervention. Methods: The outcomes of 44 EBV patients were retrospectively compared to the outcomes of 44 matched LVRS patients (matched for age, gender, performance status, body mass index (BMI), lung functions, comorbidities and exercise tolerance, matching tolerance 0.2) treated in a single institute within a 5-year period. The median follow-up was 32 months (maximum duration 84 months). Results: Mean age was 61.91±9.48 years and 55 (62.5%) were male. Postoperative morbidity was similar but length of stay (LOS) was longer in the LVRS group (median 10 Conclusions: EBV or LVRS as initial intervention are similar in terms of morbidity and mortality. EBV showed shorter LOS whilst LVRS necessitated less but more severe re-interventions and led to better overall quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.