ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2022
Refinement of a pharmacogenomics app for dosing guidelines for oncology: findings from the usability evaluation.
Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nurses' Roles in mHealth App Development: Scoping Review.JMIR nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study extended a precision medicine clinical decision support mobile application (app) for use with oncology medications. Two gene variants ( Methods: The main research variable is usability as measured by effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. A mixed method design was used. The setting was inpatient and outpatient oncology practices within North Carolina. The sample included registered nurses and nurse practitioners within the oncology field. A functioning mobile app was extended based on the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines to address the most common gene variants seen in oncology patients. Usability testing is divided into two main categories, inspection and testing methods. Prior to the field study, a heuristic evaluation was conducted. This evaluation inspected the user interface, comparing the elements and aspects of it to a set of principles, heuristics, as a guideline to evaluate the usability of the mobile app. Results: The testing evaluation was conducted with a sample of 51 health care providers to evaluate usability, measured by the System Usability Scale and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize usefulness and end-user perceived ease of use. In addition, a thematic analysis of the open-ended questions was conducted. Conclusions: The development of this mobile app is relevant to nurses who have prescriptive privileges, as well as an educational tool for nurses to understand the rationale behind prescribing certain medications and alternate dosages by providing specific recommendations. Translation of precision medicine into practice will benefit patients by improving care, reducing adverse reactions, and lowering costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.