Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618739›Full record

ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2022

Levels of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress among Ugandan adults during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional evidence from a mobile phone-based population survey.

Emma Clarke-Deelder, Slawa Rokicki, Mark E McGovern, Catherine Birabwa, Jessica L Cohen, Peter Waiswa, Catherine Abbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Urban green spaces and mental health: Findings from Uganda.Hygiene and environmental health advances · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma Clarke-DeelderUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8306-2375
Slawa RokickiDepartment of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-373X
Mark E McGovernDepartment of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0131-3466
Catherine BirabwaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Jessica L CohenDepartment of Global Health & Population, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter WaiswaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Catherine AbboDepartment of Psychiatry, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Policy measures to slow the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), such as curfews and business closures, may have negative effects on mental health. Populations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) may be particularly affected due to high rates of poverty and less comprehensive welfare systems, but the evidence is scarce. We evaluated predictors of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress in Uganda, which implemented one of the world's most stringent lockdowns. Methods: We conducted a mobile phone-based cross-sectional survey from December 2020 through April 2021 among individuals aged 18 years or over in Uganda. We measured depression, anxiety, and psychological distress using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-2, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)-2, and the PHQ-4. We applied linear regression to assess associations between experiences of COVID-19 (including fear of infection, social isolation, income loss, difficulty accessing medical care, school closings, and interactions with police) and PHQ-4 score, adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results: 29.2% of 4066 total participants reported scores indicating moderate psychological distress, and 12.1% reported scores indicating severe distress. Distress was most common among individuals who were female, had lower levels of education, and lived in households with children. Related to COVID-19, PHQ-4 score was significantly associated with difficulty accessing medical care, worries about COVID-19, worries about interactions with police over lockdown measures, and days spent at home. Conclusions: There is an urgent need to address the significant burden of psychological distress associated with COVID-19 and policy responses in LMICs. Pandemic mitigation strategies must consider mental health consequences.

Indexed as

AnxietyCOVID-19depressionglobal healthlow and middle-income countriespopulation mental healthpsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID36618739
PMCPMC9807010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.