Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36618632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Response strategies of fine root morphology of

Xiaochen Wen, Xiao Wang, Mengting Ye, Hai Liu, Wenchun He, Yu Wang, Tianyi Li, Kuangji Zhao, Guirong Hou, Gang Chen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Xiaochen WenCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xiao WangCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Mengting YeCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Hai LiuCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Wenchun HeCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Yu WangCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Tianyi LiCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Kuangji ZhaoCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Guirong HouCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Gang ChenCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Xianwei LiCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Chuan FanCollege of Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding fine root morphology is crucial to uncover water and nutrient acquisition and transposition of fine roots. However, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding how the soil environment affects the fine root morphology of various root orders in the stable forest ecosystem. Therefore, this experiment assessed the response strategies of fine root morphology (first- to fifth -order fine roots) in four different soil environments. The results showed that fine root morphology was related to soil environment, and there were significant differences in specific root length (SRL), specific surface area (SRA), diameter (D), and root tissue density (RTD) of first- and second -order fine roots. Soil total nitrogen (TN), alkaline nitrogen (AN) and available phosphorus (AP) were positively correlated with SRL and SRA and negatively correlated with D and RTD. Soil moisture (SW) was positively correlated with the D and RTD of first- and second-order fine roots and negatively correlated with the SRL and SRA. Soil temperature (ST), organic carbon (OC), soil bulk density (SBD) and soil porosity (SP) were not significantly correlated with the D, SRL, SRA, and RTD of the first- and second -order fine roots. AN was positively correlated with SRL and SRA and negatively correlated with both D and RTD in the first- and second -order fine roots, and the correlation coefficient was very significant. Therefore, we finally concluded that soil AN was the most critical factor affecting root D, SRL, SRA and RTD of fine roots, and mainly affected the morphology of first- and second -order fine roots. In conclusion, our research provides support for understanding the relationship between fine root morphology and soil environment, and indicates that soil nutrient gradient forms good root morphology at intraspecific scale.

Indexed as

Cupressus funebrisfine rootmorphological plasticityresponse strategyroot ordersoil environment

Identifiers

PMID36618632
PMCPMC9811150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.